NO, RAFE
MAIR, NO!
(In response to Rafe’s article “Baby, Ignore
the Christmas Scrooges”, The Tyee, 10/10/12)
Yes, of
course everybody is entitled to their private religious beliefs. Rafe and I can agree on that. However, one little ditty that became popular
in the sixties (from the women’s movement) is that “the private is political”. This stuck in my brain because it is demonstrably
true. Religion is both private and
political and the Christian church has done a bad political number on women
from the time Emperor Constantine adopted Christianity back at the fall of the
Roman Empire.
After Christianity became prominent through Constantine’s
conversion, church law became civil law.
Women began to lose the rights they had formally enjoyed. Under the dictates of Christianity, women in
the Roman Empire could no longer be legal guardians of their children, inherit,
vote, run a business or partake freely in society. If the women objected, their
husbands could divorce them, throw them out with no provisions, or beat them (rule of the thumb; Christian law made
wife beating legal but husbands were forbidden to use a rod for the beating
that was bigger than a man’s thumb).
Women became virtual slaves of men, with no rights of or to anything.
In his
article “Baby, Ignore the Christmas Scrooges’ Rafe presents the celebrations of
Christmas as something that is not so much religious, as a joyous cultural celebration
that only those who walk on a psychic “dark side” could object to. He cites the religious celebrations of other
religions as being also wonderful and harmless. Well, I object. I object on the grounds that both religion and
culture tend to chain people to the past instead of paving the way for the
future.
All
patriarchal religions are bad news for women.
At the moment women in Egypt are in danger of having any semblance of
their human rights voided by the takeover by the Muslim Brotherhood. The
president is determined to bring back Sharia law which includes the mandatory genital
mutilation of girls and young women and imposed wearing of the burka. Women who live under Sharia law are virtual
prisoners. And Rafe, would you believe
that it has only been in my life time that women have become legal “persons”
under Canadian law?
But that bit
of Canadian history didn’t have anything to do with religion, you say? No?
Then where did men get the idea that women weren’t persons in the first
place? You’re right. From the Christian Bible. Men were made in God’s image, but not women. And the Biblical dictum that Adam and Eve
should go forth and multiply (Genesis 1:28) almost side by side with Islam and other eastern religions
allowing multiple wives and multiple children, accompanied by the forced
compliance of women on pain of death or expulsion, is mainly responsible for
the overpopulation of the world. Birth Control?
Oh, the
struggle! Just to gain access to birth
control has been, and still is in some countries, like swimming in an alligator
infested bottomless bayou. And the right to abortion? Women’s bodies still bleeding from coat hanger
abortions litter the entire swamp of the Christian Church floor on this one. And Stephen Harper, true to his religious
beliefs, is cutting back on birth control funds internationally while spitting
in the wind over abortion.
But the Christian Church’s distinct role in
the “dictated overpopulation” of the world is not the only major catastrophe
brought upon the world by religions. The
same Biblical passage that commands people to go forth and multiply also gave
the directions for how the earth itself was to be treated. Again, Genesis 1: 28 : “and replenish the
earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the
fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth”.
I understand that Rafe is very worried about
the environment and I wonder if the Biblical passage above ever gives him
pause. This passage, in my opinion,
opened the gates a very long time ago for men’s environmental war against the
earth. However, Rafe tells us that he is a Christian because of Jesus. Jesus was different, he claims. Jesus spoke of loving your neighbors and
loving God.
But what God
was Jesus referring to when he spoke of his mission on earth? Yes, the very one Rafe chooses to ignore.
Jesus, of course, was referring to the God of the Old Testament, the furious,
murderous, vengeful God who approved of crimes against humanity. This was the only god that Jesus could
reference, the one God that he, Jesus, claimed as his literal father.
In the New
testament Matt 5:18 Jesus said: “DO NOT
THINK THAT I HAVE COME TO ABOLISH THE LAWS OR THE PROPHETS; I HAVE COME NOT TO
ABOLISH THEM BUT TO FULFILL THEM. I TELL
YOU THE TRUTH, UNTIL HEAVEN AND EARTH DISAPPEAR, NOT THE SMALLEST LETTER NOT
THE LEAST STROKE OF A PEN, WILL BY ANY MEANS DISAPPEAR FROM THE LAW UNTIL
EVERYTING IS ACCOMPLISHED.”
So there we
have it. Christians everywhere have to
carry this baggage of Jesus coming to fulfill the laws and letters of the Old Testament,
or jettison the whole thing. Christians cannot
say, with any degree of integrity of belief, that Jesus was chartering some
kind of new course in God worship. But the Christian churches persist. The fundamentalist churches like the one our
Prime Minister attends, along with the Catholic Church, obstruct women and progressive
men on every turn who demand a different order, one free of religions that have
made the world a mess. But what about the human thirst for the spiritual? To have spiritual meaning in our lives?
My own
belief is that everything is spiritual. Because
we are born encapsulated within the human form and die within this form, however
much changed, we carry our history with us.
Our entire interaction with the earth experience is spiritual. Nature
constantly combines elements, recombines them, transforms them, nothing ever
really dies, why are we so fearful that our spirits will? Yes, let’s celebrate the season, but let’s celebrate
the earth, the stars, the moon, the sun, each other, not some male inspired misogynist
story that has caused so much pain and suffering. I feel sure early women would not have
accepted Christianity, or pretended to, except under threat of death. Incidentally Rafe, not that you care, but I
don’t think Santa Claus is a good idea, either.
No comments:
Post a Comment