CLASS
WAR? IN CANADA?
Oh, yes. Just
as the class war is raging in Europe, South America, Central America, Mexico
and the US, it is also raging here. Only
it isn’t called class war by those who are waging it. When Canada and US governments wage class war
against us they call it ‘cutting back on entitlement programs.”. They tell us
this must be done in order to try to balance the budget. And to keep Americans and Canadians
safe. From Terrorists.
When corporations wage class warfare they fire
workers and buy machinery instead of employing human workers. They call this
onslaught against workers downsizing or restructuring. And as neither governments nor corporations
believe that workers have a right to jobs that pay a living wage, or an inherent
right to jobs at all, or a living wage, nothing is done to help people garner any
useful ammunition to fight this accelerating class war being waged against us.
In my opinion, our side of the class struggle is
going nowhere until the majority of us recognize that there is one vital institution
that facilitates the hot blood flow between governments and corporations that must
be stopped. Overthrown. Eliminated.
And I am becoming daily more convinced that until this is accomplished
it isn’t going to matter much who heads governments or purports to be economists
of one sort or another. Nobody in any kind of authority, including the
media, talks about how banks actually work.
And in particular one hears nothing about how our Bank of Canada relates
to the private banks in Canada.
I like
reading books on economics because I am trying to find an explanation, one that
makes sense, for why we Canadians, a
relatively small population, living in a rich resource country, with democratic
intuitions, could be struggling so desperately to keep from drowning in both
personal and national debt. The Occupy movement emphasized the economic disparity
in our country and the Idle No More uprising has emphasized the way Harper has
hijacked all of our natural resources along with First Nation’s treaty rights;
including the natural right of citizens to protest the endless Harper destruction
of this country. But still, there has
been no comprehensive explanation of how our economic system got so
skewed. But there is one little media
group that has taken the best shot at it that I’ve encountered so far.
It’s a video. It’s called OH CANADA. THE MOVIE and It’s on
You Tube. It’s made by young
people. At least a young person is the
moderator. And he gives an exceedingly simple
break down of how we got into such a sorry mess economically (and makes Paul
Martin look like a shyster used car salesman in the process; watch the man
fumble for words trying to excuse the private banks).
In the film
the young producer takes from the Bank Act itself (and I researched a copy of the
Bank Act just to check his work) and the mandate of the Bank of Canada is laid
out in the preamble:
“Whereas it
is desirable to establish a central bank in Canada to regulate credit and
currency in the best interests of the economic life of the nation, to control and
protect the external value of the national monetary unit and to mitigate by its
influence fluctuations in the general level of production, trade, prices and employment,
so far as maybe be possible within the scope of monetary action, and generally
to promote the economic and financial welfare of Canada.”
Sounds
good? It does. The Bank of Canada is our friend. Well, not exactly, at least in the way it is
used. But the Bank of Canada is a huge,
huge friend of private banks. By law,
our Canadian government could borrow all of the money it needs from the Bank of
Canada with simple interest, or little or no interest. After all, the Canadian government belongs to
us and the Bank of Canada belongs to us.
And the Bank of Canada was created to “promote the economic and
financial welfare of Canada”. But does
the Government of Canada turn to our own government bank to borrow money for
civic projects, for military, for maintenance of roads and bridges when needed
at low simple interest? It does not.
Our governments
don’t deal with our own bank; they turn to private banks to borrow money when
needed. Private banks that do not charge
simple interest, instead they all charge our government (us) compound interest.
Private banks can then, in turn, borrow from the Bank of Canada and pay back
simple interest at a very low rate. So
the private banks get very cheap money, while we get the full whammy of the private
banks compound interest.
You will
find all this on the OH CANADA. THE MOVIE video
( a note of caution: somebody is
trying to confuse the issue on YouTube
by listing first when you Google this, something c:alled: (Oh, Canada,
the film) which is not (OH CANADA. THE MOVIE):
Back to compound interest:
If example:
From the
time of the birth of Jesus Christ to 2009 what would be the difference between
simple interest and compound interest if one borrowed one dollar at six per
cent interest:
Simple
interest:
$120. 00
Compound
interest:
$69,100,838,435,849,580,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000.
Is there
anyone out there who will dispute these figures? If these figures are wrong then I would
really like to know about it. If they
are right, then I will proceed with my investigations of just how royally we
all are being…well, screwed. In the
meantime please watch OH CANADA.THE MOVIE on YouTube.
Look up on youtube a man named Bill Abram he has info on how the BoC was used and how that was changed to Private Banking and the ensuing rise in the National debt.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JuP2hH0Kpro
Look up on youtube a man named Bill Abram he has info on how the BoC was used and how that was changed to Private Banking and the ensuing rise in the National debt.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JuP2hH0Kpro
This man named Bill Abram explains the use of BoC and private banks and the reason for our ever expanding national debt.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JuP2hH0Kpro
Keep up the good fight Betty.
I am fighting along with others by removing our consent to be governed and refusing to be bound by Acts and Statutes as they only apply by our consent.